When Rajoy asked the prime minister ironically it was the mood, he never imagined that after time the answer would be found. A response given only for Zapatero himself, if not also for His Majesty King Don Juan Carlos I.
The news came this weekend. XVII Iberoamerican Summit in Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez called "true fascist" by former English prime minister in the 1996-2004 period, José María Aznar, and accused him, along with the employer employers, to support the coup that Chavez suffered in 2002.
As expected, the government of Spain sent the government of Venezuela through their representative Affairs, Miguel Angel Moratinos, the discomfort created by such statements. Later, and in plenary, the President of the English government Venezuelan reminded that "in a table where there are democratic governments, it is essential principles respect."
So far everything seems "normal", ie that Chavez is going "chestnut" and not moderate his words nor the place to express them is quite probable. Reminded the government that Mr. Aznar was the elected president for two terms and therefore, as representative of the Venezuelan state has to respect the former president Aznar, I think that also is unacceptable. But now, I never imagined what would happen from this moment. At the time that Chavez tried to interrupt Zapatero defending their right to reply, Don Juan Carlos I pointing the finger Chavez snapped a clear and resounding "Why do not you shut up?" just before leaving the room in protest. Moments later he returned for the closing at the request of the host of the summit, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, who went for the king to an adjacent room personally.
all know that the relationship Don Juan Carlos I with Aznar was not quite "fluid", several outbursts of this latter is made clear. That the current English government has only a reproach to him the previous prime minister is not a novelty. What is clear is that the institutional form of the prime minister must be absolute and can not allow a character like Chavez or sully the violation. In an unprecedented move the King to come out in defense of the institutional figure to demonstrate its democratic spirit.
I did not vote for Aznar, I disagree with the policy conducted during his time in office. I do not like being treated like the latest news about final judgments that demonstrate their attempts to conceal information from the English. But it is clear who was the president who chose English. Nor do I like the figure of the monarchy, because I believe that all English people are equal and that we all have access to the head of state through democratic elections and not by right of succession.
But I never doubted is that the majority of English are "juancarlistas" and the facts prove it.
Mr Rajoy, this is humor. I was hoping you would do the same in this situation. But instead has chosen to be more Aznar Aznar and criticize the prime minister and praise King for the defense, even if the prime minister who defended Aznar and the King who complained about Chavez's attempts to interrupt. Even your own Aznar Zapatero thanked for their presentation. But you can not think of anything else to criticize. It is what it is criticized for criticizing, in the end is without restraint or reflection and criticism goes a joke.
As a last thought made me laugh that Chavez say that the King's reaction was the result of 500 years of English imperialism and repression against them. And I say: Sure, as Chavez is indigenous name of a lifetime ...
'll see what happens now ...
Oscar Romero, who was visiting the yard.
0 comments:
Post a Comment