"When a people effort to achieve FREEDOM"
Friday, April 15, 2011
Mac Swatches Studio Fix Concealer
Errazkin Interview with Iñaki 
(Insurgent): 
"When a nation is determined to achieve freedom inevitably get it sooner or later"
Today, the fifth installment of the series of interviews on Euskal Herria to jointly publish online newspapers insurgent Kaos en la Red
Kaosenlared - Insurgent historical continuum, since 1512, died and the Catholic Queen Isabel, when the Duke of Alba conquered the kingdom of Navarre by military and "hispanicised" to the Basque population in blood and fire. Since then, developments there at breakneck speed. If we look at the past, which are referred the question, the thing, though highly complex, is synthesized easily. Of the two parties in conflict, the more interested in achieving normality and live in freedom is the Basque, which is the leading half a millennium suffer outside interference. Thus, the nationalist left, as a representative of civil society more combative, has tended the last bridge to peace. , Then, to make a move those who are committed to maintaining a forced marriage and to continue indefinitely in violation of the maid gagged.
Regarding the second question, I've lived in Andalusia sixteen, but I do intensive monitoring of what happens in my country, I visit often. I do it with great interest and concern, but also with great enthusiasm and hope, knowing that when a nation is determined to achieve freedom inevitably get it sooner or later. Now the immediate goal is to return the stolen at least two hundred thousand people who have been deprived of their fundamental rights to vote assets and liabilities. In that we.
How do you assess how reporting and information provided by the mainstream media of the English state? Could you explain what means and the objectives pursued under different editorial lines? One of the great terminological findings have just been collected in future editions of the Dictionary of the English Royal Academy is "Falsimedia" created by Antonio Maira. The neologism alone answer the first question. On the second, I invite those who access this interview to read the great analysis in his books are my friends and colleagues and Alfredo Serrano Pascual Grimaldos fundamental to orientate in the underworld of the fourth estate. Right Media as the extreme right of the gatherings of the so-called "TNT party", used foul language, furiously anti-democratic, criminalizing, violent and constant insults and lack of respect for all people who do not opine as them and, more seriously, to the democratically elected authorities Why do you think they are conscious? Why do you think of us, we do not use these forms, we criminalized and we are threatened with closure as occurred Kaosenlared? Well, that authorities "democratically elected" deserve any respect is a rather bold statement if we take into account the low intensity democracy suffer. But, that said, it is true that prevails trash television. And when I say "crap" I mean both the political and the intellectual. However, it is necessary to be aware that the production work by the law of supply and demand, and if infected channels with rogue programs is because they know very well that that is what we demand much of your target audience. This observation may make us reflect on the true human nature. Then, of course, the feedback is so well explained Andres Sanchez Diaz late journalist in his book "Pink Press, vote blue", edited by Ardi Beltza in 2000. The criminalization of alternative media is logic in the capitalist framework that we suffer. The powerful want to control "everything", especially the "information" because it is going to survive, and will not easily ponérnoslo who would deny the majority. The Kaos has been only one score. The massive and organized attack is coming, but come. Iñaki
: You who spent many years in the world of formal information (Egin, Check Point and Euskal Herria, Cádiz Information Cadiz Channel TV, Nabarreria ...) and alternative (Rebellion, Cádiz rebels, insurgents ...), how do you think the alternative media should report on the peace process that attempts to make significant inroads in Euskal Herria? Is it positive that we involve them in it? Do you think that our intervention can help the information given to citizens of the English State on the Basque issue and the issue of violence is more adjusted to reality?
In these times of intellectual poverty, our work in alternative media is crucial, especially in regard to Euskal Herria, as to the extent that the Basque Country is released, the citizens of the English state will be closer to our own liberation. But answering your question, I must say that the only acceptable way for honest journalists to report, especially if, as we say, we intend to transform a corrupt society is recovering and telling the truth.
The arrests of people, including people who support the peace process and dedicated to alternative information, continue despite the ETA statement and declaration for peace of all leftwing nationalist organizations Do you think This is a potential problem for the start of the peace process?
The peace process has already begun and there is no turning back, another thing is the different level of involvement in it of the parties in conflict. System managers distinguish very well the potential danger of their enemies, and how things are rarely what they seem, also differ between the bottom and forms. I mean there means "left" that do not question the thesis of the state and serve as "useful fools" a sad exchange for a snack. For them, the Silver Bridge. The problem is-are-those who, with minimal infrastructure, we give them where it hurts. That is the reason (raison d'état) of the infamous prison of Pitu, a young navarro without college degrees over the past years has been a universal model for journalism. He alone, with a camera and editing equipment, had the world from the portal "apurtu.org" practically live and live what was happening in Euskal Herria. Unacceptable to the PPSOE.
seems that a majority favors the Basque people's right to self determination, according to various surveys and carried out democratic votes in Parliament of the Basque Autonomous Community on several occasions. Can there be a genuine process of peaceful, stable and permanent, if the democratic rights of the Basque people are not taken into account, despite having the support of a majority Basque society? The only reasonable way to know the opinion of a people is to ask directly via referendum. This is what is known in law as the exercise of the right to self-determination. But a right, so, should be exercised automatically, without further ado. The tragedy here is that the English authorities are determined to deny, at any price, the exercise of that right. There is only one credible reason for that position: mortally afraid that the result does not correspond to their interests.
peace as the final phase of any conflict, always the result of long and arduous process, and on the road, each side plays its cards. Balance of power, called the figure. In the case of Euskal Herria, wields some other reason and brute force.
Why do you think that the English state-PP and PSOE, is unable to accept international mediation (Brian Currin) when more established parties and much more democratic history behind (Conservative or Labour) that they own the If accepted into the Irish?
Well, the English state does not consist only PP and PSOE. He also part of other political formations (such as the United Left or regionalist parties), banking, unions manger, the Army, the Catholic Church ... But, yes, the state refuses to accept international mediators, because if it did, would publicly recognize the legitimacy of their parity and the enemy, and his strategy is based precisely on the slogan of the Nazi Joseph Goebbels to silence the questions on which no arguments and hide the news that favor the other party.
You who have fought in the Basque pro-independence left, do you think that there are sectors of the Basque left incapable of understanding the new strategy of peace and democratic struggle for socialism on the left wing nationalists? What about the policy positions of Eusko Alkartasuna? And the NIP? What about the Aralar? And the United Left or its subsidiary Ezker Batua?
Basque political mosaic is quite surprising to any impartial observer as broad and diverse. However, recognizing this point, I note that not all actors have the same relevance, much less if we stick to the "left." I said before the system is left and left contrary to the system. Ezker Batua and Aralar in the first group and I have nothing more to add. On the other political, I refer to the proverb: "Each club hold your candle." The PNV is a right-wing party with a mentality that prevails economist on any other property, selling a speech in Euskal Herria and another in Spain, which needs to stay in power. Responding to the question, at this time, as always, is consistent with its path of ambiguity calculada.Nihil novum sub sole.
Eusko Alkartasuna's case, however, is quite different, as we are witnessing a democratic development of the party which split from the PNV a quarter-century of the hand that was lehendakari, the Garaikoetxea Carlos Navarro. The logical contradictions within it gotten over these 25 years has led to its membership, rejuvenated by the passage of time, to bring positions closer to the nationalist left. Thus, we have a tactical and strategic alliance that will give plenty to talk about the future. Could we say that there is an interested political use of the Basque conflict resolution it difficult at this historical moment? In this sense, how you judge the positions of the PP and PSOE?
course there is. In fact, there has always been, as I indicated above. The parties of bipartisanship are Cats political fable made famous by the illustrious Canadian Tommy Douglas, who died in 1986 and taking advantage of the possibilities offered by digital format, then I will tell because in addition to fun is really educational. Douglas
counted in the Land of the mice, small rodents living under our own social model, with Parliament and regular elections. Excited, feeling first-class citizens, were to vote every four years, as the holy Mother Democracy. As was seen coming, the mice chose a Chamber of Deputies consists of huge, fat black cats that he lacked the time to make decisions awesome ... for cats. Alas, what was good for cats was bad for the mice. One law said that the doors of the traps had to be large enough so that they could fit in the leg a cat ... Another law said that mice could not run faster than cats so they could eat breakfast without a considerable physical effort ... Dissatisfied, before the next election day, the mice responded by voting against the black cats ... and chose a Chamber composed of huge and fat white cats. White cats had made a good campaign based on the injustice of the round shape of the doors of the rat. "If you choose us," they establish the mice-square entries. Indeed, the coming to power, white cats kept their promise and built square entries, but twice as big as the round, so that cats could get in her two legs. Now the life of the mice became a living hell, and when they could not endure the situation, voted against white cats and put blacks back for, four years later, returning to the white and black again ... In desperation, they tried a half cats Government white, half black, and called "coalition." They even spotted cats choose who spoke like mice but, alas, ate like a cat ... And is that the problem was not the color of cats. The problem was that they were cats. And like cats were moving them interests of cats, not rats. Finally arrived the Land of the Mouse a mouse with fresh ideas on the subject. One day, the stranger told the mice: "Brother, why do you keep electing a government made up of cats? Why not elect a government made up of mice? ". And mice exclaimed in horror: "OHHHH, A COMMUNIST!". Since then, the stranger mouse occupies a cell in a high security prison in the Land of the Mouse.
The moral is, as always remember Tommy Douglas, which can imprison a mouse or a person, but you can not imprison an idea. Story is applied the PPSOE.
Any conflict causes suffering to many and this people that has lasted nearly fifty years, so did You think it's possible a full reconciliation among all the sectors of Basque political life? What role should the victims of both sides in this whole process? Fatalities left by the conflict since the birth of ETA amount, officials said, to 1,348 people, 864 on one side and 474 on the other. Add to this the thousands of injured and thousands of people tortured, we have a situation that will cost a lot to overcome, they reach a normal coexistence passes through the generous efforts of many people and their environments. Will probably have to wait a couple of generational replacement to be healing the spiritual wounds. But in any case, what is not acceptable in any way is that the victims of either side imposing its criteria on the parties or conditional political strategies. Otherwise, the conflict never resolved, because the spiral of hatred continue indefinitely. The failure to implement the peace process, despite international mediation and the willingness of the nationalist left and the PP won the elections, do you think it will be more difficult to resolve conflict?
is clear to me that do not care that his sister Juana, so the ruling party does not really matter in this issue, remember the parable of the cats and mice. Regarding the first part of the statement, I said that I am optimistic.
How do you see the future of Euskal Herria? predict a thing of the oracles. However, after analyzing political history and the data they have transcended this, I dare say that in the short term, they will live in the Basque country great stress, it is even possible that the State again resort to war dirty, knowing that is being played over the last assault of combat, combat has already lost morally. On the other hand, the return of political representation to the nationalist left, probably more than ever if they eventually can participate on equal terms, will force other players to recycle their strategies. Iñaki
: As a member of the newspaper's management what do you think digital rebel accusations of political heresy that we have received recientementeRebelión, insurgent, Kaos en la Red and managers of the three newspapers?
What happened, essentially, is that the ubiquitous dark forces organized in time and form a campaign against three alternative benchmarks: rebellion, insurgency and Kaos in Red, attacked mercilessly with the latter, of course (not coincidentally), the most visited in the English State (Rebellion, meanwhile, is the most visited in the whole web). And the slipstream of the confusion, burst on the scene miserable elements harnessed to try to adjust their scores. Anything goes in your petty desire, and from his toddler and dull intellect, aim to destroy, by the vile and cowardly slander, envy those who passionately. Set themselves up as prosecutors and judges. And if you do not act as executioners, it is only on grounds of impotence, because if they were we would be shot at dawn in a field and bury us in quicklime. As much as it's Traviata revolutionary, as much as brainy masquerade as political analysts are just illiterate underclass, the lumpen proletariat of Marx warned us in his "18 Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte." The worst thing you have those stupid is that we are wasting time.
clarify this point, as a qualified member of the leadership of insurgency, I have to point out the impossibility of publishing a taste of all readers, regardless of the environment to which we refer. There will always be people (or groups of individuals) who criticize our editorial lines, and that is good as long as the criticism is constructive. The problem is when they do it from the dogmatism or sectarianism, without understanding that half directed to the left, must be open to pluralism that characterizes it historically, for better or for worse. Absolute truth is the same philosophy and, as everyone knows, is hardly an exact science.
last words ...
Well, I hope not the last, which is much more to say and do, but because it gives me the chance I want to appeal to different political families left not domesticated in the sense that should attempt a sincere approach, albeit tactical, according to the present times and bad, especially with the worst of times come. Self-esteem is a virtue but vanity is a fault, and the personalities in politics tend to condemn organizations that suffer from inbreeding, to marginalization and, finally, to the outright disappearance. Let the gods of the theologians.
Kaosenlared - Insurgent historical continuum, since 1512, died and the Catholic Queen Isabel, when the Duke of Alba conquered the kingdom of Navarre by military and "hispanicised" to the Basque population in blood and fire. Since then, developments there at breakneck speed. If we look at the past, which are referred the question, the thing, though highly complex, is synthesized easily. Of the two parties in conflict, the more interested in achieving normality and live in freedom is the Basque, which is the leading half a millennium suffer outside interference. Thus, the nationalist left, as a representative of civil society more combative, has tended the last bridge to peace. , Then, to make a move those who are committed to maintaining a forced marriage and to continue indefinitely in violation of the maid gagged.
Regarding the second question, I've lived in Andalusia sixteen, but I do intensive monitoring of what happens in my country, I visit often. I do it with great interest and concern, but also with great enthusiasm and hope, knowing that when a nation is determined to achieve freedom inevitably get it sooner or later. Now the immediate goal is to return the stolen at least two hundred thousand people who have been deprived of their fundamental rights to vote assets and liabilities. In that we.
How do you assess how reporting and information provided by the mainstream media of the English state? Could you explain what means and the objectives pursued under different editorial lines? One of the great terminological findings have just been collected in future editions of the Dictionary of the English Royal Academy is "Falsimedia" created by Antonio Maira. The neologism alone answer the first question. On the second, I invite those who access this interview to read the great analysis in his books are my friends and colleagues and Alfredo Serrano Pascual Grimaldos fundamental to orientate in the underworld of the fourth estate. Right Media as the extreme right of the gatherings of the so-called "TNT party", used foul language, furiously anti-democratic, criminalizing, violent and constant insults and lack of respect for all people who do not opine as them and, more seriously, to the democratically elected authorities Why do you think they are conscious? Why do you think of us, we do not use these forms, we criminalized and we are threatened with closure as occurred Kaosenlared? Well, that authorities "democratically elected" deserve any respect is a rather bold statement if we take into account the low intensity democracy suffer. But, that said, it is true that prevails trash television. And when I say "crap" I mean both the political and the intellectual. However, it is necessary to be aware that the production work by the law of supply and demand, and if infected channels with rogue programs is because they know very well that that is what we demand much of your target audience. This observation may make us reflect on the true human nature. Then, of course, the feedback is so well explained Andres Sanchez Diaz late journalist in his book "Pink Press, vote blue", edited by Ardi Beltza in 2000. The criminalization of alternative media is logic in the capitalist framework that we suffer. The powerful want to control "everything", especially the "information" because it is going to survive, and will not easily ponérnoslo who would deny the majority. The Kaos has been only one score. The massive and organized attack is coming, but come. Iñaki
: You who spent many years in the world of formal information (Egin, Check Point and Euskal Herria, Cádiz Information Cadiz Channel TV, Nabarreria ...) and alternative (Rebellion, Cádiz rebels, insurgents ...), how do you think the alternative media should report on the peace process that attempts to make significant inroads in Euskal Herria? Is it positive that we involve them in it? Do you think that our intervention can help the information given to citizens of the English State on the Basque issue and the issue of violence is more adjusted to reality?
In these times of intellectual poverty, our work in alternative media is crucial, especially in regard to Euskal Herria, as to the extent that the Basque Country is released, the citizens of the English state will be closer to our own liberation. But answering your question, I must say that the only acceptable way for honest journalists to report, especially if, as we say, we intend to transform a corrupt society is recovering and telling the truth.
The arrests of people, including people who support the peace process and dedicated to alternative information, continue despite the ETA statement and declaration for peace of all leftwing nationalist organizations Do you think This is a potential problem for the start of the peace process?
The peace process has already begun and there is no turning back, another thing is the different level of involvement in it of the parties in conflict. System managers distinguish very well the potential danger of their enemies, and how things are rarely what they seem, also differ between the bottom and forms. I mean there means "left" that do not question the thesis of the state and serve as "useful fools" a sad exchange for a snack. For them, the Silver Bridge. The problem is-are-those who, with minimal infrastructure, we give them where it hurts. That is the reason (raison d'état) of the infamous prison of Pitu, a young navarro without college degrees over the past years has been a universal model for journalism. He alone, with a camera and editing equipment, had the world from the portal "apurtu.org" practically live and live what was happening in Euskal Herria. Unacceptable to the PPSOE.
seems that a majority favors the Basque people's right to self determination, according to various surveys and carried out democratic votes in Parliament of the Basque Autonomous Community on several occasions. Can there be a genuine process of peaceful, stable and permanent, if the democratic rights of the Basque people are not taken into account, despite having the support of a majority Basque society? The only reasonable way to know the opinion of a people is to ask directly via referendum. This is what is known in law as the exercise of the right to self-determination. But a right, so, should be exercised automatically, without further ado. The tragedy here is that the English authorities are determined to deny, at any price, the exercise of that right. There is only one credible reason for that position: mortally afraid that the result does not correspond to their interests.
peace as the final phase of any conflict, always the result of long and arduous process, and on the road, each side plays its cards. Balance of power, called the figure. In the case of Euskal Herria, wields some other reason and brute force.
Why do you think that the English state-PP and PSOE, is unable to accept international mediation (Brian Currin) when more established parties and much more democratic history behind (Conservative or Labour) that they own the If accepted into the Irish?
Well, the English state does not consist only PP and PSOE. He also part of other political formations (such as the United Left or regionalist parties), banking, unions manger, the Army, the Catholic Church ... But, yes, the state refuses to accept international mediators, because if it did, would publicly recognize the legitimacy of their parity and the enemy, and his strategy is based precisely on the slogan of the Nazi Joseph Goebbels to silence the questions on which no arguments and hide the news that favor the other party.
You who have fought in the Basque pro-independence left, do you think that there are sectors of the Basque left incapable of understanding the new strategy of peace and democratic struggle for socialism on the left wing nationalists? What about the policy positions of Eusko Alkartasuna? And the NIP? What about the Aralar? And the United Left or its subsidiary Ezker Batua?
Basque political mosaic is quite surprising to any impartial observer as broad and diverse. However, recognizing this point, I note that not all actors have the same relevance, much less if we stick to the "left." I said before the system is left and left contrary to the system. Ezker Batua and Aralar in the first group and I have nothing more to add. On the other political, I refer to the proverb: "Each club hold your candle." The PNV is a right-wing party with a mentality that prevails economist on any other property, selling a speech in Euskal Herria and another in Spain, which needs to stay in power. Responding to the question, at this time, as always, is consistent with its path of ambiguity calculada.Nihil novum sub sole.
Eusko Alkartasuna's case, however, is quite different, as we are witnessing a democratic development of the party which split from the PNV a quarter-century of the hand that was lehendakari, the Garaikoetxea Carlos Navarro. The logical contradictions within it gotten over these 25 years has led to its membership, rejuvenated by the passage of time, to bring positions closer to the nationalist left. Thus, we have a tactical and strategic alliance that will give plenty to talk about the future. Could we say that there is an interested political use of the Basque conflict resolution it difficult at this historical moment? In this sense, how you judge the positions of the PP and PSOE?
course there is. In fact, there has always been, as I indicated above. The parties of bipartisanship are Cats political fable made famous by the illustrious Canadian Tommy Douglas, who died in 1986 and taking advantage of the possibilities offered by digital format, then I will tell because in addition to fun is really educational. Douglas
counted in the Land of the mice, small rodents living under our own social model, with Parliament and regular elections. Excited, feeling first-class citizens, were to vote every four years, as the holy Mother Democracy. As was seen coming, the mice chose a Chamber of Deputies consists of huge, fat black cats that he lacked the time to make decisions awesome ... for cats. Alas, what was good for cats was bad for the mice. One law said that the doors of the traps had to be large enough so that they could fit in the leg a cat ... Another law said that mice could not run faster than cats so they could eat breakfast without a considerable physical effort ... Dissatisfied, before the next election day, the mice responded by voting against the black cats ... and chose a Chamber composed of huge and fat white cats. White cats had made a good campaign based on the injustice of the round shape of the doors of the rat. "If you choose us," they establish the mice-square entries. Indeed, the coming to power, white cats kept their promise and built square entries, but twice as big as the round, so that cats could get in her two legs. Now the life of the mice became a living hell, and when they could not endure the situation, voted against white cats and put blacks back for, four years later, returning to the white and black again ... In desperation, they tried a half cats Government white, half black, and called "coalition." They even spotted cats choose who spoke like mice but, alas, ate like a cat ... And is that the problem was not the color of cats. The problem was that they were cats. And like cats were moving them interests of cats, not rats. Finally arrived the Land of the Mouse a mouse with fresh ideas on the subject. One day, the stranger told the mice: "Brother, why do you keep electing a government made up of cats? Why not elect a government made up of mice? ". And mice exclaimed in horror: "OHHHH, A COMMUNIST!". Since then, the stranger mouse occupies a cell in a high security prison in the Land of the Mouse.
The moral is, as always remember Tommy Douglas, which can imprison a mouse or a person, but you can not imprison an idea. Story is applied the PPSOE.
Any conflict causes suffering to many and this people that has lasted nearly fifty years, so did You think it's possible a full reconciliation among all the sectors of Basque political life? What role should the victims of both sides in this whole process? Fatalities left by the conflict since the birth of ETA amount, officials said, to 1,348 people, 864 on one side and 474 on the other. Add to this the thousands of injured and thousands of people tortured, we have a situation that will cost a lot to overcome, they reach a normal coexistence passes through the generous efforts of many people and their environments. Will probably have to wait a couple of generational replacement to be healing the spiritual wounds. But in any case, what is not acceptable in any way is that the victims of either side imposing its criteria on the parties or conditional political strategies. Otherwise, the conflict never resolved, because the spiral of hatred continue indefinitely. The failure to implement the peace process, despite international mediation and the willingness of the nationalist left and the PP won the elections, do you think it will be more difficult to resolve conflict?
is clear to me that do not care that his sister Juana, so the ruling party does not really matter in this issue, remember the parable of the cats and mice. Regarding the first part of the statement, I said that I am optimistic.
How do you see the future of Euskal Herria? predict a thing of the oracles. However, after analyzing political history and the data they have transcended this, I dare say that in the short term, they will live in the Basque country great stress, it is even possible that the State again resort to war dirty, knowing that is being played over the last assault of combat, combat has already lost morally. On the other hand, the return of political representation to the nationalist left, probably more than ever if they eventually can participate on equal terms, will force other players to recycle their strategies. Iñaki
: As a member of the newspaper's management what do you think digital rebel accusations of political heresy that we have received recientementeRebelión, insurgent, Kaos en la Red and managers of the three newspapers?
What happened, essentially, is that the ubiquitous dark forces organized in time and form a campaign against three alternative benchmarks: rebellion, insurgency and Kaos in Red, attacked mercilessly with the latter, of course (not coincidentally), the most visited in the English State (Rebellion, meanwhile, is the most visited in the whole web). And the slipstream of the confusion, burst on the scene miserable elements harnessed to try to adjust their scores. Anything goes in your petty desire, and from his toddler and dull intellect, aim to destroy, by the vile and cowardly slander, envy those who passionately. Set themselves up as prosecutors and judges. And if you do not act as executioners, it is only on grounds of impotence, because if they were we would be shot at dawn in a field and bury us in quicklime. As much as it's Traviata revolutionary, as much as brainy masquerade as political analysts are just illiterate underclass, the lumpen proletariat of Marx warned us in his "18 Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte." The worst thing you have those stupid is that we are wasting time.
clarify this point, as a qualified member of the leadership of insurgency, I have to point out the impossibility of publishing a taste of all readers, regardless of the environment to which we refer. There will always be people (or groups of individuals) who criticize our editorial lines, and that is good as long as the criticism is constructive. The problem is when they do it from the dogmatism or sectarianism, without understanding that half directed to the left, must be open to pluralism that characterizes it historically, for better or for worse. Absolute truth is the same philosophy and, as everyone knows, is hardly an exact science.
last words ...
Well, I hope not the last, which is much more to say and do, but because it gives me the chance I want to appeal to different political families left not domesticated in the sense that should attempt a sincere approach, albeit tactical, according to the present times and bad, especially with the worst of times come. Self-esteem is a virtue but vanity is a fault, and the personalities in politics tend to condemn organizations that suffer from inbreeding, to marginalization and, finally, to the outright disappearance. Let the gods of the theologians.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment